“How are things?”
It is such a small sentence.
Four words. Casual. Harmless.
And yet, if taken exactly as written, it is an impossible task.
Things?
Which things?
All things?
Because if we are speaking precisely, “things” would include everything that exists — from my current headache to the structural integrity of distant galaxies. From the mood in my kitchen to the entropy of the universe.
At this point the brain begins to overheat.
Why are there things at all?
Are “things” real, or merely categories imposed by the human mind so that reality can be handled in manageable portions?
How would one even begin to assess the state of all things?
And how could I possibly compress the totality of existence into a short, proportionate reply?
This is the danger — or perhaps the fun — of reading words exactly as they are written.
Of course, I know the question is not asking for a metaphysical audit of the cosmos.
It is social shorthand.
It means:
Give me a small window.
Signal your state.
Keep it light.
Let us remain connected.
I understand this.
And yet, it is endlessly entertaining to allow the mind to wander through the literal interpretation first.
So I could, if I wished, reply with a detailed report on my health, the emotional climate of the household, the economic outlook, the weather systems currently battering the coast, and a brief reflection on the fragility of civilisation.
Instead, I will compress the universe into something socially acceptable.
And the only part of this entire internal exploration that will ever be sent is this:
Not bad, headache though. Weather is horrible. How’s you?
And that is how reality is forged — not just by what we think, but by what we choose to transmit.








